← Perspectives

I have never believed that marketing and leadership are separate disciplines. The longer I work, the more convinced I am that they are the same thing — just described in different languages depending on who is in the room.

Over two decades, I have run brand campaigns for private companies chasing market share. I have built public communications for government institutions managing national trust. And I have shaped messaging for development organisations trying to move entire populations — farmers, students, communities — toward a different vision of their own futures. Three sectors. Three entirely different definitions of what it means to reach people. And one consistent truth threading through all of them: the quality of your communication is the quality of your leadership. Nothing separates the two.

Here are the five insights I carry into every mandate.

1. Positioning Is Not a Marketing Exercise. It Is a Leadership Decision.

In the private sector, I watched organisations spend enormous energy on brand positioning work — agencies, workshops, brand books, taglines — only to have the positioning mean nothing the moment a customer called their service line or dealt with a difficult invoice. The brand said one thing. The institution did another.

That gap is not a communications failure. It is a leadership failure that communications has been asked to paper over. The most powerful positioning I have seen in Ghana was not built in an agency. It was built through consistent behaviour over time. Before you ask what your brand should say, ask whether your institution has earned the right to say it.

2. The Public Sector Has the Hardest Marketing Problem in the World — and Treats It Like an Afterthought.

I have been in rooms where billion-cedi government programmes were launched through a poorly printed flyer and a press conference nobody attended. The programme was real. The need was real. But the communication was an afterthought — something to do after the policy was designed, not a core part of how the policy would succeed.

When I worked on the 112 emergency services rollout, the challenge was not infrastructure. Ghana had the ambulances, the call centre, the trained dispatchers. The challenge was behavioural: getting millions of people who had never trusted a government phone line to believe that this time it would work. That is a marketing problem of the highest order. In public sector communications, the campaign is the policy. If people do not know about it, understand it, or trust it, the programme does not exist for them.

3. Development Sector Marketing Is the Most Honest Test of Whether Your Message Actually Works.

There is nowhere to hide in community-level communications work. When you are running a programme like Ghana Grows — trying to shift the behaviour of smallholder farmers, connect young people to agricultural opportunity, and change how communities think about who farming is for — you cannot rely on reach alone. Reach is easy. You can plaster a message across radio stations and still have changed nothing.

What development communications taught me is the discipline of the insight. Before any message, before any channel — what does this person actually believe right now, and what would it take to move that belief? Not what should they believe. What do they believe. The distinction is everything. Empathy is not a soft skill in marketing. It is the entire technical foundation.

4. In Ghana, Distribution Is the Strategy.

I have seen brilliant campaigns die in Accra. Perfect creative. Sharp copy. Zero reach beyond the ring road. Ghana is not one market. It is sixteen regions, dozens of languages, rural and urban realities that bear almost no resemblance to each other, and a media landscape where traditional channels — radio, community announcements, church notices, market days — still reach more people more reliably than any digital platform.

The most effective work I have been part of always started with the distribution question, not the creative question. How does this message travel to the person who needs it? In Ghana, the last mile is not a logistics problem. It is a communications philosophy. Leaders who understand this build things that last.

5. The Leader Is Always the Brand. Whether They Know It or Not.

In every sector, at every level, the leader is the primary communications asset of the institution. Not the logo. Not the campaign. Not the press release. The person at the top — how they carry themselves, how they speak under pressure, how they treat people when the cameras are off — that is what the institution communicates to the world, constantly, without a budget.

I have advised organisations with strong brands and weak leaders. The brand always erodes eventually. I have advised organisations with modest brands and exceptional leaders — consistent, clear, trustworthy in everything they said and did. Those institutions punch above their weight in ways no campaign could manufacture. In a market like Ghana, where institutional trust is fragile and hard-won, this is not just good leadership advice. It is survival.

Private sector taught me speed and accountability. Public sector taught me systems thinking and patience. The development sector taught me humility and the primacy of the audience. The leaders and organisations that understand communication this way are the ones Ghana needs most right now.

View All Perspectives →